{
  "schema_version": "1.0",
  "record_type": "mistake_journal_template",
  "item_id": "qs-representation-001",
  "property": "QuietStride Learning",
  "subject": "Clinical reasoning",
  "topic": "Problem Representation: A PT Student Framework",
  "prompt": "Which summary stays closest to the supplied evidence?",
  "options": {
    "A": "A worker has a confirmed tendon disorder caused by overhead work.",
    "B": "A worker reports persistent shoulder discomfort during overhead tasks. Examination findings remain unknown.",
    "C": "A worker has shoulder discomfort with normal strength and no neurological features.",
    "D": "A worker\u2019s symptoms are mild because rest reduces them."
  },
  "correct_option": "B",
  "selected_option": null,
  "confidence_before": null,
  "learner_reasoning": null,
  "is_correct": null,
  "error_type": null,
  "conceptual_trap": "A plausible interpretation can become an unsupported fact. The case does not confirm a diagnosis, normal strength or symptom severity.",
  "evidence_check": "The case supplies duration, task association and functional difficulty. It supplies no examination findings. Option B preserves that boundary.",
  "corrected_rule": "Trace every claim to supplied evidence and preserve relevant unknowns.",
  "source_url": "https://www.mededportal.org/doi/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10445",
  "transfer_question": "How should the summary change after the person reports three nights of sleep disturbance this week?",
  "transfer_answer": "Add the reported sleep disturbance while retaining the unknown examination and further history. That detail alone does not establish a diagnosis or severity category.",
  "created_at": null,
  "review_due": null,
  "review_status": "unattempted"
}